Discussion about this post

User's avatar
World at Rest's avatar

I enjoyed your article, and agree that sometimes, Jesus neither condemns nor affirms. We need to learn to do most of the judging of our own character that needs to happen in the heart of a disciple.

Your article conveyed the side of Jesus that it seems to me, Jesus shows to all of the people of the world who have yet to encounter him ... a voice of hope and acceptance, of non-judgment and confident expectation of good results in due course ... at each person’s pace. That is refreshing compared to the messaging non-Christians get from so much of Christian “evangelism”: “If you don’t accept Jesus, you are doomed.” I think Jesus’ words in John 3:17 should suffice on this point. “God sent not his Son to condemn the world, but that the world through him might be made safe and sound.” The promise of the cross comes from its completeness, even for the enemies of Jesus. “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”

But let me suggest a third option, when you pointed out the Pharisees’ hoped-for trap for Jesus: that if He said they not stone her, he would be in violation of the law of Moses.

There’s an obscure law of Moses on adultery that is seldom considered: the situation described in Numbers 5 in which a husband suspects his wife of adultery, but cannot prove it.

It seems likely to me that Jesus knew they had no witnesses. Therefore, the Numbers 5 law was applicable. Remember his challenge to the crowd, “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.” Throwing the first stone was the duty of the two witnesses who had testified against a person in any capital offense. Two or three witnesses were required, and each of them were duty-bound to be the first to throw a stone if a guilty verdict was decided by the town council. When Jesus put forward that requirement, the crowd melted away. He had called their bluff.

By writing in the dust on the ground, Jesus hints at the Numbers 5 law applicability to the case. In such cases, the High Priest wrote down the evidence and charges. He then dissolved the ink containing those charges in a vessel containing water from the laver, in which all visitors to the Temple or Tabernacle, including the priests themselves, washed before entering the Holy for service in the presence of God. In this way Jesus was showing himself to be the High Priest, and he was also showing himself to be the water of Life.

In the Number 5 account, after the priest had dissolved the charges against the woman, he gathered dust from the floor of the Holy (first) chamber of the Tabernacle/Temple, and sprinkled that dust into the vessel along with the ink which had embodied the suspicions of the husband. Then the Priest gave the sullied water to the woman to drink.

Now the judgment was left to God. It could be likened to the crucible which Malachi wrote of, in which the “sons of Levi”, the underpriests, were examined and purified in a furnace of trials.

Jesus was teaching the Pharisees, and his own disciples, that we are always being purified and “made white” and tried in our daily life as disciples of Jesus.

In the Numbers 7 law regarding adultery, If the woman became pregnant and delivered a healthy baby, she was proven to have been cleared of sin by God himself ... the Judge who stood above even the High Priest as an authority in our lives. But if she developed a uterine disease or delivered a miscarriage, this was held to be God’s judgment that the woman had been guilty of adultery as the husband suspected.

I think Jesus knew that she was guilty, but showed that in his role as high priest, he had secured the power to deliver and exonerate any transgressor who repented. So he said to her, “Go and sin no more.” No doubt, she became a disciple of Jesus, and realized full forgiveness for all of her past sins.

The smelly part of the Pharisees’ challenge to Jesus in the John 8 account is the lie that they began with. “In our law she must be stoned.” No, in the law which required stoning, BOTH the adulterous man AND woman were to be stoned. But there had to be witnesses, and there had to be two guilty parties. Since no man was being charged, Jesus knew they were lying and did not have witnesses to implicate the man along with the woman.

The trial by fire which the Numbers 5 law demanded is a beautiful indication, it seems to me, of the course of action that any Christian can avail themselves of when they find that their bridegroom, Jesus, has reason to doubt their fidelity to Him. Often we fall short of our own statements of faith and belief. Often we break the commitments of our heavenly bridegroom, that we love one another, serve one another, lay down our lives for one another, believe his promises to us, etc. What can we do? Throw ourselves at Jesus’ mercy and submit to God’s judgment. Know that if we have a ready mind, we are not judged at the throne of Grace by what we don’t have, but by what we have. ALWAYS, we as Christians can enter BOLDLY to the throne of grace, to find more grace to help us in times of need. (Hebrews 10:19,20)

If we drink the water of purification, the word of Truth, it will sometimes be bitter to our taste, pointing out our sins as disciples of Jesus. And when we add to that mixture the dust of the Holy ... the place where both we and all the other underpriests do our daily chores of refreshing the bread of life and bringing prayers as incense upon the altar in the Holy, along with the blood of the sin offering that was offered for us ... that concoction reveals our worthiness of being found “faithful unto death”. By persisting in the work of service to all the other brothren iand sisters in Christ whom we remain in fellowship with, we satisfy the Heavenly Father that we have remained faithful to our calling into his family. We will be fruitful if persist in bearing fruit.

The apostle Paul described this idea in 1 Corinthians 3, where he says that if the work of our life as Christians is burned up, we suffer loss, but our spirit is nevertheless saved ... though perhaps through difficult trials. But if our life work as Christians survives the fire, it becomes apparent to us and our fellow-servants that our character is made up of gold, silver, and precious stones. Those gems of good character, Paul says, become the basis for God graciously rewarding us with additional joys of service in the next era, and the next level of existence promised to faithful Christians in the celestials.

Or, in the paraphrased words of Malachi, “God purifies the sons of Levi, putting them through a trial of fire in which the refiner looks to see his image reflected in the pure gold and silver that is refined in the furnace of life.”

I think Jesus does concern himself with our purity of heart, he does reinforce and reward our faithfulness ... but he also embraces us when we fail as perhaps that woman had done, and reinstates us as he did for her ... with a gentle admonition to “go forward. Keep going in repentance ... sin no more and experience fulness of joy on the other side of this difficult experience.”

He knew her heart, no doubt, and he knows all men and women who are serving him may stumble into sin because of the incompleteness of our character. What we need is not shaming, self-hate or discouragement. What we need is a pure resolve to learn from our mistakes and a commitment to trust the transformative process Jesus our High Priest, working with the Heavenly Father, can accomplish if we continue to walk with Him, and in fellowhip with our brethren in Christ.

As Paul put it in 2 Thessalonians 2:16-17 (Weymouth): “And may our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God our Father who has loved us and has given us in His grace eternal consolation and good hope, comfort your hearts and make you steadfast in every good work and word.”

Sorry this comment was so long.... Loved your article.

No posts

Ready for more?